Celeron 837 vs Athlon PRO 300GE
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1966 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 7.53 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (6 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon PRO 300GE and Celeron 837 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 34 | 18 |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 504 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon PRO 300GE and Celeron 837 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Celeron 837. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Celeron 837 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Celeron 837. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.75 | 0.33 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Athlon PRO 300GE has 733.3% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 837, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon PRO 300GE and Intel Celeron 837. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon PRO 300GE is a desktop processor while Celeron 837 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
