Athlon II X2 250 vs Athlon PRO 300GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 300GE
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.86
+309%

Athlon PRO 300GE outperforms Athlon II X2 250 by a whopping 309% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 300GE and Athlon II X2 250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15972617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.033.61
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date30 September 2019 (4 years ago)June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$39
Current price$1116 $27 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X2 250 has 250% better value for money than Athlon PRO 300GE.

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 300GE and Athlon II X2 250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm45 nm
Die size209.78 mm2117 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 300GE and Athlon II X2 250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Athlon II X2 250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Athlon II X2 250 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Athlon II X2 250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 300GE 2.86
+309%
Athlon II X2 250 0.70

Athlon PRO 300GE outperforms Athlon II X2 250 by 309% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon PRO 300GE 4423
+310%
Athlon II X2 250 1080

Athlon PRO 300GE outperforms Athlon II X2 250 by 310% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon PRO 300GE 908
+198%
Athlon II X2 250 305

Athlon PRO 300GE outperforms Athlon II X2 250 by 198% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon PRO 300GE 1754
+232%
Athlon II X2 250 529

Athlon PRO 300GE outperforms Athlon II X2 250 by 232% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.86 0.70
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

The Athlon PRO 300GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 300GE and Athlon II X2 250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Athlon PRO 300GE
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Athlon II X2 250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 109 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 300GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1074 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 300GE or Athlon II X2 250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.