Xeon Gold 5512U vs Athlon Neo X2 L335

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon Gold 5512U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated80
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data97.85
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x AMD Athlon Neono data
Power efficiencyno data19.44
Architecture codenameCongo (2009)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,230

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon Gold 5512U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data52.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data89 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon Gold 5512U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1 BGAFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon Gold 5512U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHT 3.0, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon Gold 5512U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon Gold 5512U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon Gold 5512U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon Gold 5512U.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 529
Xeon Gold 5512U 60365
+11311%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2009 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 185 Watt

Athlon Neo X2 L335 has 927.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5512U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon Gold 5512U. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon Neo X2 L335 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5512U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon Gold 5512U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
Athlon Neo X2 L335
Intel Xeon Gold 5512U
Xeon Gold 5512U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5512U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo X2 L335 or Xeon Gold 5512U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.