Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Athlon MP 2800+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon MP 2800+ and Xeon Platinum 8352M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.13
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Athlon MPno data
Architecture codenameK7 (2000−2003)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date6 May 2003 (21 year ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$275no data
Current priceno data$9928

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon MP 2800+ and Xeon Platinum 8352M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus support266 MT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm10 nm
Die size101 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors54 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon MP 2800+ and Xeon Platinum 8352M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
Socketno dataFCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon MP 2800+ and Xeon Platinum 8352M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Athlon MP 2800+ and Xeon Platinum 8352M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon MP 2800+ and Xeon Platinum 8352M are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon MP 2800+ and Xeon Platinum 8352M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 GB6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon MP 2800+ and Xeon Platinum 8352M.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon MP 2800+ 497
Xeon Platinum 8352M 44406
+8835%

Xeon Platinum 8352M outperforms Athlon MP 2800+ by 8835% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2003 6 April 2021
Physical cores 1 32
Threads 1 64
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 185 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon MP 2800+ and Xeon Platinum 8352M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon MP 2800+ and Xeon Platinum 8352M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon MP 2800+
Athlon MP 2800+
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352M
Xeon Platinum 8352M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon MP 2800+ or Xeon Platinum 8352M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.