Ryzen Threadripper 1940X vs Athlon MP 2800+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3371 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Athlon MP | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.20 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 6 May 2003 (22 years ago) | 29 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $275 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon MP 2800+ and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 16 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 54 Million | 9,600 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon MP 2800+ and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon MP 2800+ and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon MP 2800+ and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon MP 2800+ and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Quad-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 May 2003 | 29 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 14 |
| Threads | 1 | 28 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 180 Watt |
Athlon MP 2800+ has 200% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon MP 2800+ and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon MP 2800+ is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1940X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
