Xeon Platinum 8593Q vs Athlon MP 1000
Primary details
Comparing Athlon MP 1000 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD Athlon MP | no data |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2003) | no data |
| Release date | 5 June 2001 (23 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $215 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon MP 1000 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus support | 266 MT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 320 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 128 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 60 °C |
| Number of transistors | 38 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon MP 1000 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 46.1 Watt | 385 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon MP 1000 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Athlon MP 1000 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon MP 1000 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon MP 1000 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC) |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon MP 1000 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 June 2001 | 1 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 64 |
| Threads | 1 | 128 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 46 Watt | 385 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Athlon MP 1000 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon MP 1000 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
