Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Athlon II X4 651

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 651
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.26
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.43
+538%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Athlon II X4 651 by a whopping 538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1817495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency2.1448.77
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM1FP8
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 651 2.26
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.43
+538%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 651 3584
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22919
+539%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 14.43
Recency 14 November 2011 1 October 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 28 Watt

Athlon II X4 651 has -75% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 538.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 651 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X4 651 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 651
Athlon II X4 651
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 185 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 651 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 651 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.