Ryzen 7 7730U vs Athlon II X4 651

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 651
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.26
Ryzen 7 7730U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.77
+421%

Ryzen 7 7730U outperforms Athlon II X4 651 by a whopping 421% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen 7 7730U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1815659
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.1373.95
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Barcelo-U Refresh (2023)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen 7 7730U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size228 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen 7 7730U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen 7 7730U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen 7 7730U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen 7 7730U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen 7 7730U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 651 2.26
Ryzen 7 7730U 11.77
+421%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 651 3584
Ryzen 7 7730U 18627
+420%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II X4 651 333
Ryzen 7 7730U 1641
+393%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II X4 651 1108
Ryzen 7 7730U 6361
+474%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 11.77
Recency 14 November 2011 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 7730U has a 420.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7730U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 651 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X4 651 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7730U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 651 and Ryzen 7 7730U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 651
Athlon II X4 651
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
Ryzen 7 7730U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 185 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 651 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 996 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7730U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 651 or Ryzen 7 7730U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.