Apple M2 Pro vs Athlon II X4 651
Aggregate performance score
Apple M2 Pro outperforms Athlon II X4 651 by a whopping 508% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X4 651 and M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1831 | 544 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 2.14 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | no data |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (13 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X4 651 and M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 3.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 40000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X4 651 and M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 651 and M2 Pro are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 651 and M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.26 | 13.73 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 17 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M2 Pro has a 507.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
The M2 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 651 in performance tests.
Note that Athlon II X4 651 is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 651 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
