A6-9225 vs Athlon II X4 645

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 645
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.52
+76.7%

Athlon II X4 645 outperforms A6-9225 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 645 and A6-9225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20482462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.30no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date21 September 2010 (13 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data
Current price$40 (0.5x MSRP)$451

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 645 and A6-9225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size169 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors300 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 645 and A6-9225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3BGA
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 645 and A6-9225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 645 and A6-9225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 645 and A6-9225.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 645 1.52
+76.7%
A6-9225 0.86

Athlon II X4 645 outperforms A6-9225 by 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon II X4 645 2347
+75.8%
A6-9225 1335

Athlon II X4 645 outperforms A6-9225 by 76% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II X4 645 320
+18.1%
A6-9225 271

Athlon II X4 645 outperforms A6-9225 by 18% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II X4 645 972
+115%
A6-9225 453

Athlon II X4 645 outperforms A6-9225 by 115% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.52 0.86
Recency 21 September 2010 1 June 2018
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

The Athlon II X4 645 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9225 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X4 645 is a desktop processor while A6-9225 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 645 and A6-9225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 645
Athlon II X4 645
AMD A6-9225
A6-9225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 374 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2224 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 645 or A6-9225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.