A10-5700 vs Athlon II X4 645

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 645
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.48
A10-5700
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.73
+16.9%

A10-5700 outperforms Athlon II X4 645 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 645 and A10-5700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21672044
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.30no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.472.52
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date21 September 2010 (14 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 645 and A10-5700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size169 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors300 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 645 and A10-5700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 645 and A10-5700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 645 and A10-5700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7660D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 645 and A10-5700.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 645 1.48
A10-5700 1.73
+16.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 645 2351
A10-5700 2744
+16.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II X4 645 320
A10-5700 400
+25%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II X4 645 969
A10-5700 1003
+3.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 1.73
Recency 21 September 2010 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

A10-5700 has a 16.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The A10-5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 645 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 645 and A10-5700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 645
Athlon II X4 645
AMD A10-5700
A10-5700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 394 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 168 votes

Rate A10-5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 645 or A10-5700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.