i7-620UE vs Athlon II X4 641
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2458 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Power efficiency | 1.40 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 6 February 2012 (13 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $248 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X4 641 and Core i7-620UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.07 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.07 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 1.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 1 × 2.5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 8 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 382 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X4 641 and Core i7-620UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FM1 | Intel BGA 1288 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 641 and Core i7-620UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon II X4 641 and Core i7-620UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 641 and Core i7-620UE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 641 and Core i7-620UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 12.799 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 641 and Core i7-620UE.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 February 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 18 Watt |
Athlon II X4 641 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores.
i7-620UE, on the other hand, has 455.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon II X4 641 and Intel Core i7-620UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X4 641 is a desktop processor while Core i7-620UE is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
