Athlon 64 2650e vs Athlon II X4 640
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon 64 2650e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2216 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.92 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.40 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Propus (2009−2011) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 11 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon 64 2650e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 169 mm2 | 77 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 300 million | 122 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon 64 2650e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon 64 2650e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon 64 2650e.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 May 2010 | 1 January 2009 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Athlon II X4 640 has an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 2650e, on the other hand, has 533.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon 64 2650e. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon 64 2650e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
