Pentium 917 vs Athlon II X4 635

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 635 and Pentium 917 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2104not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.86no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date25 January 2010 (14 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data
Current price$29 (0.4x MSRP)$21

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 635 and Pentium 917 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size169 mm2131 mm2
Number of transistors300 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 635 and Pentium 917 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Pentium 917. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMAno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Pentium 917. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Pentium 917.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 17 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 635 and Pentium 917. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon II X4 635 is a desktop processor while Pentium 917 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 635 and Pentium 917, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 635
Athlon II X4 635
Intel Pentium 917
Pentium 917

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 216 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 635 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium 917 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 635 or Pentium 917, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.