Sempron 3000+ vs Athlon II X4 631

Place in the ranking	2246	3236
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	1.27	0.29
Architecture codename	Llano (2011−2012)	Palermo (2001−2005)
Release date	17 August 2011 (13 years ago)	1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$50

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 631 and Sempron 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	4	1
Base clock speed	2.6 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.6 GHz	1.8 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	128 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	130 nm
Die size	228 mm²	144 mm²
Number of transistors	1,178 million	63 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 631 and Sempron 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FM1	939
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	62 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 631 and Sempron 3000+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 631 and Sempron 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 631 1.34
+605%

Sempron 3000+ 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 631 2122
+610%

Sempron 3000+ 299

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.34	0.19
Recency	17 August 2011	1 October 2005
Physical cores	4	1
Threads	4	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	62 Watt

Athlon II X4 631 has a 605.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Sempron 3000+, on the other hand, has 61.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon II X4 631 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3000+ in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 631 and Sempron 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.