EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Athlon II X4 631

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2562not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency0.51no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date17 August 2011 (14 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 631 and EPYC Embedded 3201 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 631 and EPYC Embedded 3201 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM1AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 631 and EPYC Embedded 3201. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 631 and EPYC Embedded 3201 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 631 and EPYC Embedded 3201. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2133
Maximum memory sizeno data512 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.13 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 631 and EPYC Embedded 3201.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data32

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 August 2011 21 February 2018
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 30 Watt

EPYC Embedded 3201 has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon II X4 631 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon II X4 631 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3201 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 631
Athlon II X4 631
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
EPYC Embedded 3201

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 131 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 631 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate EPYC Embedded 3201 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon II X4 631 and EPYC Embedded 3201, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.