Atom E640 vs Athlon II X4 630

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 630 and Atom E640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2233not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency1.35no data
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Tunnel Creek (2010)
Release date16 September 2009 (15 years ago)14 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 630 and Atom E640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size169 mm226 mm2
Number of transistors300 million47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 630 and Atom E640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3Intel BGA 676
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 630 and Atom E640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 630 and Atom E640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel GMA 600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 630 and Atom E640.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 September 2009 14 September 2010
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 3 Watt

Athlon II X4 630 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom E640, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 3066.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 630 and Atom E640. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon II X4 630 is a desktop processor while Atom E640 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 630 and Atom E640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 630
Athlon II X4 630
Intel Atom E640
Atom E640

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 323 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Atom E640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 630 or Atom E640, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.