Athlon MP 1800+ vs Athlon II X4 630

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 630 and Athlon MP 1800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2235not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon MP
Power efficiency1.35no data
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date16 September 2009 (15 years ago)15 October 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63$302

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 630 and Athlon MP 1800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.53 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266 MT/s
Multiplierno data11.5
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm180 nm
Die size169 mm2128 mm2
Number of transistors300 million38 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 630 and Athlon MP 1800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM3no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt66 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 630 and Athlon MP 1800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 630 and Athlon MP 1800+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 September 2009 15 October 2001
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 66 Watt

Athlon II X4 630 has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon MP 1800+, on the other hand, has 43.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 630 and Athlon MP 1800+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon II X4 630 is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 1800+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 630 and Athlon MP 1800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 630
Athlon II X4 630
AMD Athlon MP 1800+
Athlon MP 1800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 323 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 630 or Athlon MP 1800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.