Xeon Gold 5318Y vs Athlon II X4 620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 620
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.27
Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
20.86
+1543%

Xeon Gold 5318Y outperforms Athlon II X4 620 by a whopping 1543% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 620 and Xeon Gold 5318Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2300266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.43no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.2711.96
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date16 September 2009 (15 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 620 and Xeon Gold 5318Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size169 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data87 °C
Number of transistors300 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 620 and Xeon Gold 5318Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 620 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon II X4 620 and Xeon Gold 5318Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 620 and Xeon Gold 5318Y are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 620 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 620 and Xeon Gold 5318Y.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 620 1.27
Xeon Gold 5318Y 20.86
+1543%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 620 2019
Xeon Gold 5318Y 33139
+1541%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 20.86
Recency 16 September 2009 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 165 Watt

Athlon II X4 620 has 73.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5318Y, on the other hand, has a 1542.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5318Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 620 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X4 620 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5318Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 620 and Xeon Gold 5318Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 620
Athlon II X4 620
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Xeon Gold 5318Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 194 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 620 or Xeon Gold 5318Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.