EPYC Embedded 3301 vs Athlon II X4 620
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2574 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.43 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 1.30 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Propus (2009−2011) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 16 September 2009 (16 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | $450 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X4 620 and EPYC Embedded 3301 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 20 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 1152 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 169 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 300 million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X4 620 and EPYC Embedded 3301 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 620 and EPYC Embedded 3301. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 620 and EPYC Embedded 3301 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 620 and EPYC Embedded 3301. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 620 and EPYC Embedded 3301.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 September 2009 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3301 has an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon II X4 620 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3301. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X4 620 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3301 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
