Celeron N2805 vs Athlon II X4 620

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2279not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.43no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.27no data
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date16 September 2009 (15 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.46 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size169 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data80 °C
Number of transistors300 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt4.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 620 2018
+502%
Celeron N2805 335

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 September 2009 11 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 4 Watt

Athlon II X4 620 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron N2805, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 2275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon II X4 620 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2805 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 620 and Celeron N2805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 620
Athlon II X4 620
Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 190 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 98 votes

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 620 or Celeron N2805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.