Xeon W-3275M vs Athlon II X4 615e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 615e
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.14
Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
23.00
+1918%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Athlon II X4 615e by a whopping 1918% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2544270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.231.72
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency1.074.74
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date21 September 2010 (15 years ago)3 June 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X4 615e has 146% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 615e and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads456
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache128 KB (per core)1.75 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)28 MB
L3 cache0 KB38.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size169 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Number of transistors300 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 615e and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 615e and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon II X4 615e and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 615e and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 615e and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 615e and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon II X4 615e 1.14
Xeon W-3275M 23.00
+1918%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon II X4 615e 2000
Samples: 25
Xeon W-3275M 40419
+1921%
Samples: 30

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 23.00
Recency 21 September 2010 3 June 2019
Physical cores 4 28
Threads 4 56
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 205 Watt

Athlon II X4 615e has 355.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275M, on the other hand, has a 1917.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon II X4 615e in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X4 615e is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 615e
Athlon II X4 615e
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 615e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon II X4 615e and Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.