EPYC 74F3 vs Athlon II X4 615e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 615e
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.29
EPYC 74F3
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
39.22
+2940%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Athlon II X4 615e by a whopping 2940% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 615e and EPYC 74F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking218966
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.2312.17
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Milan (2021)
Release date21 September 2010 (13 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59$2,900
Current price$54 (0.9x MSRP)$2990 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 74F3 has 188% better value for money than Athlon II X4 615e.

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 615e and EPYC 74F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size169 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors300 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 615e and EPYC 74F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 615e and EPYC 74F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 615e and EPYC 74F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 615e and EPYC 74F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 615e and EPYC 74F3.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 615e 1.29
EPYC 74F3 39.22
+2940%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Athlon II X4 615e by 2940% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon II X4 615e 2000
EPYC 74F3 60666
+2933%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Athlon II X4 615e by 2933% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 39.22
Recency 21 September 2010 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Cost $59 $2900
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 240 Watt

The EPYC 74F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 615e in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X4 615e is a desktop processor while EPYC 74F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 615e and EPYC 74F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 615e
Athlon II X4 615e
AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 14 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 615e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 615e or EPYC 74F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.