AMD Phenom X4 9550 vs Athlon II X3 435

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Athlon II X3 435
1.07

Phenom X4 9550 outperforms Athlon II X3 435 by 1% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom X4 9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22792273
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money6.721.03
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRana (2009−2011)Agena (2007−2008)
Release dateOctober 2009 (14 years old)March 2008 (16 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$160no data
Current price$17.65 (0.1x MSRP)$67
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X3 435 has 552% better value for money than Phenom X4 9550.

Technical specs

Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom X4 9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads34
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size169 mm2285 mm2
Number of transistors300 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom X4 9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom X4 9550 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom X4 9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X3 435 1.07
Phenom X4 9550 1.08
+0.9%

Phenom X4 9550 outperforms Athlon II X3 435 by 1% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon II X3 435 1644
Phenom X4 9550 1656
+0.7%

Phenom X4 9550 outperforms Athlon II X3 435 by 1% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II X3 435 325
+39.5%
Phenom X4 9550 233

Athlon II X3 435 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 by 39% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II X3 435 834
+17.6%
Phenom X4 9550 709

Athlon II X3 435 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 by 18% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.07 1.08
Physical cores 3 4
Threads 3 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom X4 9550. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom X4 9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X3 435
Athlon II X3 435
AMD Phenom X4 9550
Phenom X4 9550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 147 votes

Rate AMD Athlon II X3 435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 135 votes

Rate AMD Phenom X4 9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X3 435 or Phenom X4 9550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.