Ultra 7 268V vs Athlon II X3 435

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X3 435
2009
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
1.03
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
15.09
+1365%

Core Ultra 7 268V outperforms Athlon II X3 435 by a whopping 1365% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X3 435 and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2445460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency1.0384.00
Architecture codenameRana (2009−2011)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date9 October 2009 (15 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X3 435 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads38
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size169 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors300 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X3 435 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X3 435 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon II X3 435 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X3 435 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 435 and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X3 435 and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 15.09
Recency 9 October 2009 24 September 2024
Physical cores 3 8
Threads 3 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 268V has a 1365% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 458.8% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 268V is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X3 435 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X3 435 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 268V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X3 435 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X3 435
Athlon II X3 435
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 155 votes

Rate Athlon II X3 435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X3 435 or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.