Pentium 8500 vs Athlon II X2 280
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X2 280 and Pentium 8500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2502 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.52 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-M |
Architecture codename | Regor (2009−2013) | Alder Lake-U (2022) |
Release date | 6 February 2013 (11 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $100 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X2 280 and Pentium 8500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 6 |
Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 464 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 3.5 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 117 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 410 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X2 280 and Pentium 8500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM3 | BGA1744 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 280 and Pentium 8500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | no data | + |
AVX | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon II X2 280 and Pentium 8500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 280 and Pentium 8500 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 280 and Pentium 8500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 280 and Pentium 8500.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 6 February 2013 | 4 January 2022 |
Physical cores | 2 | 5 |
Threads | 2 | 6 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 9 Watt |
Pentium 8500 has an age advantage of 8 years, 150% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 622.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X2 280 and Pentium 8500. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X2 280 is a desktop processor while Pentium 8500 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 280 and Pentium 8500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.