Sempron 140 vs Athlon II X2 250u

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 250u and Sempron 140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Sargas (2009−2011)
Release date20 October 2009 (15 years ago)22 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35$40

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 250u and Sempron 140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size117 mm2117 mm2
Number of transistors410 million234 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 250u and Sempron 140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3AM3
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt45 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 250u and Sempron 140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 250u and Sempron 140.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 250u 598
+23%
Sempron 140 486

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 October 2009 22 July 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

Athlon II X2 250u has an age advantage of 2 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X2 250u and Sempron 140. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 250u and Sempron 140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 250u
Athlon II X2 250u
AMD Sempron 140
Sempron 140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 16 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 250u on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 231 vote

Rate Sempron 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 250u or Sempron 140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.