EPYC Embedded 3401 vs Athlon II X2 250
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3022 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.61 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 1.01 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Regor (2009−2013) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 2 June 2009 (16 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X2 250 and EPYC Embedded 3401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.85 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 18.5 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 1536 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 117 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 410 million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X2 250 and EPYC Embedded 3401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 250 and EPYC Embedded 3401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 250 and EPYC Embedded 3401 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 250 and EPYC Embedded 3401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 250 and EPYC Embedded 3401.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 June 2009 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 85 Watt |
Athlon II X2 250 has 30.8% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 3401, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon II X2 250 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3401. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X2 250 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3401 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
