A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 250

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Athlon II X2 250
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.70
+12.9%

Athlon II X2 250 outperforms A4-3300 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 250 and A4-3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25842651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.613.72
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release dateJune 2009 (14 years ago)7 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$39no data
Current price$26 (0.7x MSRP)$40

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A4-3300 has 3% better value for money than Athlon II X2 250.

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 250 and A4-3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size117 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors410 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 250 and A4-3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 250 and A4-3300 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 250 and A4-3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 6410D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 250 and A4-3300.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 250 0.70
+12.9%
A4-3300 0.62

Athlon II X2 250 outperforms A4-3300 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon II X2 250 1080
+12.3%
A4-3300 962

Athlon II X2 250 outperforms A4-3300 by 12% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II X2 250 305
+2.7%
A4-3300 297

Athlon II X2 250 outperforms A4-3300 by 3% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II X2 250 529
+0.4%
A4-3300 527

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.62
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm

The Athlon II X2 250 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 250 and A4-3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 250
Athlon II X2 250
AMD A4-3300
A4-3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1047 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 99 votes

Rate A4-3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 250 or A4-3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.