Ryzen 5 3600 vs Athlon II X2 220

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 220
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.66
Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.17
+1592%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Athlon II X2 220 by a whopping 1592% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 220 and Ryzen 5 3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2741692
Place by popularitynot in top-1009
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.3021.94
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency0.9616.26
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date21 September 2010 (14 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$32$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3600 has 314% better value for money than Athlon II X2 220.

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 220 and Ryzen 5 3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size117 mm2no data
Number of transistors410 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 220 and Ryzen 5 3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 220 and Ryzen 5 3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 220 and Ryzen 5 3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 220 and Ryzen 5 3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 220 and Ryzen 5 3600.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 220 0.66
Ryzen 5 3600 11.17
+1592%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 220 1043
Ryzen 5 3600 17747
+1602%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II X2 220 287
Ryzen 5 3600 1614
+462%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II X2 220 494
Ryzen 5 3600 6916
+1300%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 11.17
Recency 21 September 2010 7 July 2019
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm

Ryzen 5 3600 has a 1592.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 220 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 220 and Ryzen 5 3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 220
Athlon II X2 220
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 231 vote

Rate Athlon II X2 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 17263 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 220 or Ryzen 5 3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.