E1 Micro-6200T vs Athlon II X2 210e

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 210e
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 45 Watt
0.70
+84.2%
E1 Micro-6200T
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 3 Watt
0.38

Athlon II X2 210e outperforms E1 Micro-6200T by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 210e and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27233030
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.479.11
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Mullins (2014)
Release date21 September 2010 (14 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 210e and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size117 mm2no data
Number of transistors410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 210e and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt3.95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 210e and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 210e and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 210e and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon II X2 210e and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon II X2 210e and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 210e and E1 Micro-6200T.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 210e 0.70
+84.2%
E1 Micro-6200T 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 210e 1105
+84.2%
E1 Micro-6200T 600

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.38
Recency 21 September 2010 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 3 Watt

Athlon II X2 210e has a 84.2% higher aggregate performance score.

E1 Micro-6200T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The Athlon II X2 210e is our recommended choice as it beats the E1 Micro-6200T in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X2 210e is a desktop processor while E1 Micro-6200T is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 210e and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 210e
Athlon II X2 210e
AMD E1 Micro-6200T
E1 Micro-6200T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 25 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 210e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 29 votes

Rate E1 Micro-6200T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 210e or E1 Micro-6200T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.