Xeon w7-3565X vs Athlon II P360

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II P360
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.45
Xeon w7-3565X
2024
32 cores / 64 threads, 335 Watt
48.25
+10622%

Xeon w7-3565X outperforms Athlon II P360 by a whopping 10622% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II P360 and Xeon w7-3565X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking295036
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.68
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlon IIno data
Power efficiency1.7013.63
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date16 December 2010 (14 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,689

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II P360 and Xeon w7-3565X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Performance-coresno data32
Threads264
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data82.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II P360 and Xeon w7-3565X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt335 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P360 and Xeon w7-3565X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVMIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon II P360 and Xeon w7-3565X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II P360 and Xeon w7-3565X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II P360 and Xeon w7-3565X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II P360 and Xeon w7-3565X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II P360 0.45
Xeon w7-3565X 48.25
+10622%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II P360 711
Xeon w7-3565X 76649
+10680%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.45 48.25
Recency 16 December 2010 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 335 Watt

Athlon II P360 has 1240% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3565X, on the other hand, has a 10622.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

The Xeon w7-3565X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II P360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon II P360 is a notebook processor while Xeon w7-3565X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II P360 and Xeon w7-3565X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II P360
Athlon II P360
Intel Xeon w7-3565X
Xeon w7-3565X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 97 votes

Rate Athlon II P360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3565X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II P360 or Xeon w7-3565X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.