Atom x7405C vs Athlon II P360

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II P360 and Atom x7405C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2934not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon IIno data
Power efficiency1.70no data
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date16 December 2010 (13 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$57

Detailed specifications

Athlon II P360 and Atom x7405C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II P360 and Atom x7405C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P360 and Atom x7405C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVMno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II P360 and Atom x7405C are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II P360 and Atom x7405C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II P360 and Atom x7405C.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 December 2010 8 April 2024
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 12 Watt

Atom x7405C has an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II P360 and Atom x7405C. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II P360 and Atom x7405C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II P360
Athlon II P360
Intel Atom x7405C
Atom x7405C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 95 votes

Rate Athlon II P360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7405C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II P360 or Atom x7405C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.