Celeron 877 vs Athlon II P340
General info
Comparing Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Athlon II | Intel Celeron |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 4 October 2010 (13 years old) | 1 July 2012 (11 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $86 |
Current price | $169 | $528 (6.1x MSRP) |
Technical specs
Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Bus support | 3200 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 504 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | S1g4 | FCBGA1023 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | SSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVM | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | no data | - |
FMA | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
My WiFi | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.3 GB/s |
ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | no data | + |
HDMI | no data | + |
SDVO | no data | + |
CRT | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron 877 outperforms Athlon II P340 by 27% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron 877 outperforms Athlon II P340 by 44% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Athlon II P340 outperforms Celeron 877 by 1% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Advantages and disadvantages
Recency | 4 October 2010 | 1 July 2012 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 17 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II P340 and Celeron 877, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.