i3-7320T vs Athlon II P320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3234not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon IIIntel Core i3
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date12 May 2010 (15 years ago)17 July 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$147

Detailed specifications

Athlon II P320 and Core i3-7320T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate3200 MHz8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II P320 and Core i3-7320T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1g41151
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P320 and Core i3-7320T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVMno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II P320 and Core i3-7320T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II P320 and Core i3-7320T.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 May 2010 17 July 2017
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon II P320 has 3400% lower power consumption.

i3-7320T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon II P320 and Intel Core i3-7320T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon II P320 is a notebook processor while Core i3-7320T is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II P320
Athlon II P320
Intel Core i3-7320T
Core i3-7320T

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 83 votes

Rate Athlon II P320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7320T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon II P320 and Core i3-7320T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.