Atom Z560 vs Athlon II P320

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II P320 and Atom Z560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon IIIntel Atom
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II P320 and Atom Z560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate3200 MHz533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache256 KB56 KB
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data24.18 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.75V-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II P320 and Atom Z560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1g4PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P320 and Atom Z560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVMIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon II P320 and Atom Z560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II P320 and Atom Z560 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II P320 and Atom Z560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataunknown

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 2 Watt

Athlon II P320 has 100% more physical cores.

Atom Z560, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II P320 and Atom Z560. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II P320 and Atom Z560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II P320
Athlon II P320
Intel Atom Z560
Atom Z560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 74 votes

Rate Athlon II P320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Atom Z560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II P320 or Atom Z560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.