EPYC 9745 vs Athlon II N370

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II N370
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.56
EPYC 9745
2024
128 cores / 256 threads, 400 Watt
94.08
+16700%

EPYC 9745 outperforms Athlon II N370 by a whopping 16700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II N370 and EPYC 9745 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28972
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.49
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlon IIno data
Power efficiency1.52no data
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Turin (2024)
Release date16 December 2010 (14 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12,141

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II N370 and EPYC 9745 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)128
Threads2256
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size117.5 mm2no data
Number of transistors234 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II N370 and EPYC 9745 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketS1SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II N370 and EPYC 9745. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II N370 and EPYC 9745 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II N370 and EPYC 9745. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II N370 and EPYC 9745.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon II N370 0.56
EPYC 9745 94.08
+16700%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II N370 899
EPYC 9745 150920
+16688%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 94.08
Recency 16 December 2010 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 128
Threads 2 256
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 400 Watt

Athlon II N370 has 1042.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9745, on the other hand, has a 16700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9745 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II N370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon II N370 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9745 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II N370
Athlon II N370
AMD EPYC 9745
EPYC 9745

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Athlon II N370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9745 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon II N370 and EPYC 9745, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.