Athlon II M320 vs Athlon II N330

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II N330
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
Athlon II M320
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.47
+11.9%

Athlon II M320 outperforms Athlon II N330 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II N330 and Athlon II M320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29722907
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon IIAMD Athlon II
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Caspian (2009)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II N330 and Athlon II M320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHz3200 MHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size117.5 mm2no data
Number of transistors234 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II N330 and Athlon II M320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1Socket S1 (S1g3)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II N330 and Athlon II M320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II N330 and Athlon II M320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II N330 and Athlon II M320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II N330 0.42
Athlon II M320 0.47
+11.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II N330 665
Athlon II M320 749
+12.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon II N330 1999
+11.4%
Athlon II M320 1795

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon II N330 3837
+10.4%
Athlon II M320 3476

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon II N330 1943
+16.5%
Athlon II M320 1668

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.47
Recency 12 May 2010 10 September 2009

Athlon II N330 has an age advantage of 8 months.

Athlon II M320, on the other hand, has a 11.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Athlon II M320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II N330 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II N330 and Athlon II M320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II N330
Athlon II N330
AMD Athlon II M320
Athlon II M320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Athlon II N330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 32 votes

Rate Athlon II M320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II N330 or Athlon II M320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.