i3-10100F vs Athlon II M320

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II M320 and Core i3-10100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1124
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.85
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon IIno data
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)12 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II M320 and Core i3-10100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II M320 and Core i3-10100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1 (S1g3)FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II M320 and Core i3-10100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Athlon II M320 and Core i3-10100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II M320 and Core i3-10100F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II M320 and Core i3-10100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II M320 and Core i3-10100F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II M320 743
i3-10100F 8765
+1080%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II M320 182
i3-10100F 1450
+697%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II M320 325
i3-10100F 4482
+1279%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2009 12 October 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon II M320 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i3-10100F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II M320 and Core i3-10100F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon II M320 is a notebook processor while Core i3-10100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II M320 and Core i3-10100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II M320
Athlon II M320
Intel Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 32 votes

Rate Athlon II M320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7363 votes

Rate Core i3-10100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II M320 or Core i3-10100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.