Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs Athlon Gold 7220C
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 23 May 2023 (2 years ago) | July 2025 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 33,260 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 4 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 350 Watt |
Athlon Gold 7220C has 2233.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon Gold 7220C and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon Gold 7220C is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
