EPYC 9845 vs Athlon Gold 7220C

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Gold 7220C and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)no data
Architecture codenameMendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)Turin (2024)
Release date23 May 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$13,564

Detailed specifications

Athlon Gold 7220C and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)160
Threads4320
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm3 nm
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Gold 7220C and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Gold 7220C and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Gold 7220C and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Gold 7220C and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 610MN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Gold 7220C and EPYC 9845.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 160
Threads 4 320
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 390 Watt

Athlon Gold 7220C has 2500% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 7900% more physical cores and 7900% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Gold 7220C and EPYC 9845. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon Gold 7220C is a notebook processor while EPYC 9845 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Gold 7220C and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Gold 7220C
Athlon Gold 7220C
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 7220C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Gold 7220C or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.