Xeon 6710E vs Athlon Gold 3150U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Gold 3150U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.23
Xeon 6710E
2024
64 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
34.75
+1458%

Xeon 6710E outperforms Athlon Gold 3150U by a whopping 1458% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2002117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.03
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)no data
Power efficiency6.337.21
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameDali (Zen) (2020)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date6 January 2020 (5 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon Gold 3150U and Xeon 6710E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache96 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB (per module)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size148 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors3,500 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Gold 3150U and Xeon 6710E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP5FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Gold 3150U and Xeon 6710E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon Gold 3150U and Xeon 6710E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Gold 3150U and Xeon 6710E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Gold 3150U and Xeon 6710E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Gold 3150U and Xeon 6710E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1288

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon Gold 3150U 2.23
Xeon 6710E 34.75
+1458%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon Gold 3150U 3934
Samples: 261
Xeon 6710E 61404
+1461%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.23 34.75
Recency 6 January 2020 3 June 2024
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 4 64
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 205 Watt

Athlon Gold 3150U has 1266.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6710E, on the other hand, has a 1458.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 3100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6710E is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon Gold 3150U in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon Gold 3150U is a notebook processor while Xeon 6710E is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
Athlon Gold 3150U
Intel Xeon 6710E
Xeon 6710E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1082 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 3150U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6710E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon Gold 3150U and Xeon 6710E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.