A4-4020 vs Athlon Gold 3150U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Gold 3150U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.61
+214%

Athlon Gold 3150U outperforms A4-4020 by a whopping 214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Gold 3150U and A4-4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17402600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)no data
Power efficiency15.871.16
Architecture codenameDali (Zen) (2020)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Gold 3150U and A4-4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache192 KB96K
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Gold 3150U and A4-4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP5FM2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Gold 3150U and A4-4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
PowerNow-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Gold 3150U and A4-4020 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Gold 3150U and A4-4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon HD 7480D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Gold 3150U and A4-4020.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon Gold 3150U 2.61
+214%
A4-4020 0.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Gold 3150U 3988
+215%
A4-4020 1268

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon Gold 3150U 816
+143%
A4-4020 336

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon Gold 3150U 1672
+282%
A4-4020 438

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.61 0.83
Integrated graphics card 2.98 0.72
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon Gold 3150U has a 214.5% higher aggregate performance score, 313.9% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Gold 3150U is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4020 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon Gold 3150U is a notebook processor while A4-4020 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Gold 3150U and A4-4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
Athlon Gold 3150U
AMD A4-4020
A4-4020

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 904 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 3150U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate A4-4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Gold 3150U or A4-4020, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.