EPYC 9745 vs Athlon Gold 3150G

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Gold 3150G and EPYC 9745 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1344not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency6.36no data
Architecture codenameDali (2020)Turin (2024)
Release date21 July 2020 (4 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12,141

Detailed specifications

Athlon Gold 3150G and EPYC 9745 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)128
Threads4256
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm3 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Gold 3150G and EPYC 9745 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Gold 3150G and EPYC 9745. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Gold 3150G and EPYC 9745 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Gold 3150G and EPYC 9745. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Gold 3150G and EPYC 9745.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 July 2020 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 128
Threads 4 256
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 400 Watt

Athlon Gold 3150G has 515.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9745, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Gold 3150G and EPYC 9745. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon Gold 3150G is a desktop processor while EPYC 9745 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Gold 3150G and EPYC 9745, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Gold 3150G
Athlon Gold 3150G
AMD EPYC 9745
EPYC 9745

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 18 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 3150G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9745 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Gold 3150G or EPYC 9745, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.