Xeon W-3275M vs Athlon 950
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 950 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 201 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.07 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon W |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.70 |
| Architecture codename | Thunderbird (1999−2000) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 6 March 2000 (24 years ago) | 3 June 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $7,453 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 950 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.95 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 25 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 1.75 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 38.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 102 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 76 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 22 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 950 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | A | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 950 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 950 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 950 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 950 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 950 and Xeon W-3275M.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 March 2000 | 3 June 2019 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 28 |
| Threads | 1 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 205 Watt |
Athlon 950 has 230.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon W-3275M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 950 and Xeon W-3275M. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 950 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 950 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
