Athlon XP-M 2400+ vs Athlon 900
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 900 and Athlon XP-M 2400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Architecture codename | Thunderbird (1999−2000) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 6 March 2000 (24 years ago) | January 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 900 and Athlon XP-M 2400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 13.5 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 102 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 22 million | 54 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 900 and Athlon XP-M 2400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 900 and Athlon XP-M 2400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 900 and Athlon XP-M 2400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 35 Watt |
Athlon XP-M 2400+ has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 900 and Athlon XP-M 2400+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 900 is a desktop processor while Athlon XP-M 2400+ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 900 and Athlon XP-M 2400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
