EPYC 7532 vs Athlon 800
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 205 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.11 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Thunderbird (1999−2000) | Zen 2 (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 20 December 1999 (26 years ago) | 19 February 2020 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Athlon 800 and EPYC 7532: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 102 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 22 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 800 and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | A | Socket SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 800 and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 800 and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 800 and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 December 1999 | 19 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 200 Watt |
Athlon 800 has 365% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 2471% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 800 and AMD EPYC 7532. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 800 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7532 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
