Celeron G4900 vs Athlon 700

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.95
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data2.80
Architecture codenameThunderbird (1999−2000)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date29 November 1999 (25 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$849$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.7 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data31
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography180 nm14 nm
Die size102 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C72 °C
Number of transistors22 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAFCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)34 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 November 1999 3 April 2018
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 34 Watt 54 Watt

Athlon 700 has 58.8% lower power consumption.

Celeron G4900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 700 and Celeron G4900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 700
Athlon 700
Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon 700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 116 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 700 or Celeron G4900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.