Phenom II X2 N660 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-57

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3270not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x Athlon 642x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency0.49no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameHawk-256Champlain (2010−2011)
Release dateno data1 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Phenom II X2 N660 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Phenom II X2 N660 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataS1
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Phenom II X2 N660. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHyperTransport 3.0, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Vurtualization
VirusProtect-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Phenom II X2 N660. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 176
Phenom II X2 N660 349
+98.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 315
Phenom II X2 N660 613
+94.6%

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 has 12.9% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X2 N660, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and AMD Phenom II X2 N660. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
AMD Phenom II X2 N660
Phenom II X2 N660

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 23 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 18 votes

Rate Phenom II X2 N660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Phenom II X2 N660, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.