Atom CE4150 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-55

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Atom CE4150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64no data
Architecture codenameTaylor / Hawk-256Sodaville (2009)
Release dateno data24 September 2009 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Atom CE4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data56 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data96 mm2
Number of transistorsno data47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Atom CE4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 951
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Atom CE4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Atom CE4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 7 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom CE4150, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 342.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Atom CE4150. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Atom CE4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Intel Atom CE4150
Atom CE4150

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 27 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom CE4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 or Atom CE4150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.